In the rapidly evolving landscape of software development, the distinction between good and exceptional often hinges on one key process: code reviews. When your team is driving hard towards the next release, thorough and efficient code reviews make all the difference.
And while every engineer and QA team understands the
Don’t start your code review process documentation from scratch. Use our code review checklist as a foundation for a more efficient and thorough code review process.
Testing Mixtapes: quality beats, curated by testers is an interview series by Qase. For each interview, we ask leaders from the QA, software development, and testing industries to share a little about themselves, dig into a topic they’re passionate about, and create a mixtape that matches their vibe.
So
Black box and white box testing are distinct methodologies with opposing objectives. However, they can complement each other to improve testing effectiveness. Black box testing evaluates an application from the user's perspective, while white box testing examines the code and internal design. This article explores both methods, their types, techniques,
Automated tools tend to promise programmers and development teams faster, more efficient workflows, but relying solely on automated code review tools won’t guarantee you high-quality code.
Automated code review is the process of using software tools to automatically analyze source code for issues such as bugs, security vulnerabilities, and
Code review is a standard part of the software development process in many companies, but in many cases performing code reviews is inefficient or even illogical.
For this article, I’ll focus on only pull-request-based code reviews. With pull-request code reviews, a developer works on some code and then sends
