#1 Rated test management platform 2025

Qase vs. Practitest:

Test Management
That's Modern, Flexible, and Actually Easy to Use

Looking for a PractiTest alternative? You’re in the right place. Qase has helped thousands of customers improve the speed, efficiency and observability of their testing.

Start free trial

Book a Demo

Why QA Teams Choose Qase Over Practitest

Item

Intuitive UI

Built for QA, no Jira navigation maze

Item

True Jira Integration

Seamless 2-way sync without being limited by Jira's slowness

Item

AI-Powered Testing

Automate test creation & execution – no coding needed

Item

Powerful Reporting

Custom dashboards, traceability, and KPIs out-of-the-box

Item

Only Pay for QA Users

Don't license every Jira user just to view a test

Item

World-Class Support

Rated #1 for support on G2 – lightning-fast responses

FEATURE COMPARISON

See Why Qase Outperforms Practitest

Side-by-side comparison of key features that matter most to modern QA teams

Qase

Recommended

Practitest

Legacy Solution

Cost Per User

$20/mo standard, $30/month business, custom for enterprise

$37-$49/mo Team plan with 5 user minimum, custom for corporate with 10 user minimum

API

REST API, 600 requests per min, option to raise

REST API, fewer than 30 requests per min

Shared steps

Yes, create single Shared Steps or Shared Step groups that contain multiple steps

No, steps must be recreated manually for every test project

Public Roadmap

Yes, with prioritization for customer requests

Test case review

Business plan & up enables test case review, with ability to add comments and request changes

PractiTest does not offer test review

Reports

Customizable drag-and-drop widgets with various data visualizations, RBAC links, data for every test step

Limited to 5 standard report templates in Excel or PDF

What Customers Say

Real feedback from teams who chose Qase

Qase has been a valuable addition to our QA process, and we highly recommend it to any team looking for a reliable, user-friendly test management solution.

Reviewers say compared to Qase, PractiTest is slower to reach ROI and more expensive.

After testing all the test cases, I can share a report that is viewable by anyone I share the link to. This is super helpful if someone needs a quick glance on how UAT is going or the current status of a story.

I don't like that reports on it cannot be resized or rearranged more freely, this I believe would be really beneficial and would help tell a better story on our QA efforts to the stakeholders.

One of the standout features of Qase is its intuitive interface, which makes it easy for even novice testers to get started. The platform provides a range of tools and templates that can be used to quickly create and organize test cases, manage test runs and track their results.

One thing I don't like about PractiTest is how steep the learning curve might be at the beginning compared to other programs. Inexperienced users may feel overwhelmed.

Having the possibility to share public reports is also a big plus since we no longer need to provide unnecessary Excel sheets, but rather we provide an easy-to-use report that shows everything that we need.

When creating dashboards/reports I have to export each project then customize for senior management due to the fact that I cannot create reports for all projects.

By having an easy-to-use interface and offering the option to create shared steps, this ends up speeding up the test case creation process.

User Interface lags sometimes, Design looks old and can be improved.

Since we started using Qase, testing has become more fun and much faster. We are now doing more tests in 2 days than before in 2 weeks.

The learning curve is big… New users may need to invest time in training and onboarding to become proficient in using the tool, which can be a challenge for teams with limited resources.

COST SAVINGS