Looking for a Testmo alternative? Qase goes further on scalability and automation depth. Qase eliminates maintenance overhead with Shared Steps, delivers Dynamic RTM, and keeps teams agile with an API-first approach designed for high-velocity QA.
Both products offer clean, modern UX. Qase focuses that usability on scale by avoiding duplication-heavy workflows through Shared Steps.
Qase provides Dynamic RTM that updates coverage when requirements change, helping teams stay audit-ready without manual rework.
Qase supports reusable Shared Steps to centralize common flows like login or setup. Testmo does not support Shared Steps, forcing duplication.
Qase offers low-cost read-only seats ($2–$5/user/month). Testmo bills every activated user at full price.
Qase’s AIDEN is live for automated test generation and execution. Testmo’s AI path is tied to Sembi IQ, with early AI rollouts prioritized for TestRail.
Qase provides 24/5 global support.
What's included:
What's included:
What's included:
Testmo supports many tools via a CLI but can require workarounds in some environments. Qase uses API-driven CI/CD patterns (e.g., GitHub Actions and webhooks) to automate runs and consolidate results.
Yes. Shared Steps in Qase let you define common sequences once and reuse them widely. Testmo lacks Shared Steps, so changes to common flows require editing every dependent case.
Qase offers low-cost read-only seats ($2–$5/user/mo) for viewers. Testmo requires a full-price license for every activated user, which inflates TCO when many stakeholders only need visibility.
Qase’s AIDEN is already live for AI-assisted test creation and execution. Testmo’s AI is tied to Sembi IQ and is expected later, after TestRail’s initial rollout, leaving a timing gap Qase currently leads.

